Price · last 3 months · daily close
BLK price
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
ValeriusBeta - Not investment advice
Research · S&P 500 · Financials
The numbers, the scorecard and what analysts say, with the source for each. Information, not advice.
Price · last 3 months · daily close
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
Value Scorecard · run 2026-10-18
9 of the 12 checks that carry a score were scored from the data available. 3 could not be scored (ROIC, DCF Value, Margin of Safety) and were left out, so the score is out of 45 instead of 60. The label uses the same share of the available points as for a full scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence from the filings, without a score.
Earnings & returns
Diluted EPS: $33.97 (2022), $36.51 (2023), $42.01 (2024), $35.31 (2025). It rose every year but one and ended above 2022; the framework scores that as 4.
ROE (net income / common equity): 13.7% (2022), 14.0% (2023), 13.4% (2024), 9.9% (2025). Median 13.6%, lowest 9.9%; the framework scores a median 10-15% as 3.
ROIC not available: the 10-K financial data filed with the SEC has no standard operating income figure (or pre-tax income and interest expense), total assets and current liabilities for the same fiscal year.
Net margin of 24.2%; the framework scores above 20% as 5; gross margin 48.3%, operating margin 37.9%.
Balance sheet & cash
Debt-to-equity of 0.23; the framework scores below 0.3 as 5 (total debt $14.97B, total cash $13.84B).
Free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditure): $4.42B (2022), $3.82B (2023), $4.70B (2024), $3.55B (2025). It ended at or below 2022; the framework scores that as 2.
Retained earnings, as filed in the 10-Ks (SEC EDGAR): $32.34B (2023), $35.61B (2024), $37.90B (2025). It rose every year; the framework scores that as 5.
Valuation models
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y) = $43.92 x (8.5 + 2 x 0.0) x (4.4 / 4.5) = $365.02 (EPS CAGR -1.7% floored at 0%; the formula returns a negative value below -4.25% growth). Current price $1,134.38; price is 210.8% above the model value.
Free cash flow or share count is not available from the data source, so no DCF value is computed.
Needs both a Graham value and a DCF value. Graham value $365.02 (price is 210.8% above the model value); DCF value N/A (not comparable).
P/B of 3.05; the framework scores 3.0-5.0 as 2.
Business quality
A moat (a brand, a network, switching costs, patents, scale, a licence) is not a number in the filings, so Valerius doesn’t score it. Below are the figures and the words moat analysis starts from, from the company’s own 10-K filings. The conclusion is yours.
Return on capital, each year
Not available: the 10-K financial data has no standard figures for operating income, total assets and current liabilities in the same years, as is common for banks, insurers and REITs.
Gross margin, each year
Not reported: the filings don’t state a gross profit or cost of revenue figure, as is common for oil and gas companies, banks and insurers.
Competition, in the company’s own words · 10-K filed Feb 25, 2026
BlackRock competes with investment management firms, mutual fund complexes, insurance companies, banks, brokerage firms, financial technology providers and other financial institutions that offer products that are similar to, or alternatives to, those offered by BlackRock. In order to grow its business, BlackRock must be able to compete effectively for AUM. Key competitive factors include investment performance track records, the efficient delivery of beta for index products, investment style and discipline, price, client service and brand name recognition. Historically, the Company has competed principally on the basis of its long-term investment performance track record, its investment process, its risk management and analytic capabilities and the quality of its client service.
The opening of the company’s “COMPETITION” section in its 10-K, quoted word for word, not summarized or edited. It is the company’s own description, not Valerius’s view, and may include the company’s expectations. Open the filing.
Return on capital = operating income / (total assets − current liabilities), the ROIC row’s definition; 15% is the framework’s return threshold. Gross margin = gross profit / revenue. Both from each year’s 10-K via SEC EDGAR. Moat analysis commonly looks at whether returns and margins held up over many years. These figures don’t say whether the company has an advantage, what it is, or whether it will last.
Capital allocation, 2022-2025: dividends or buybacks paid in every year (pass); $20.57B paid out against $16.50B of free cash flow (fail: paid out more than free cash flow); total debt $8.49B to $15.00B, up 76.7%, 1.6x EBITDA (pass: at most 2x EBITDA); shares outstanding 0.15B to 0.16B, up 3.5% (fail: up more than 2%). 2 of 4 tests passed; the framework scores that as 3.
Filings
Three kinds of event the company reported to the SEC in the last 5 years, from its filings on SEC EDGAR.
Loading...
These are events the company reported to the SEC. An auditor change or a late filing can have many causes; each date links to the filing, where the company explains it. Valerius does not score these.
Graham Formula:
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y)
EPS = $43.92, g = 0.0%, Y = 4.5
g floored at 0.0% (3-year EPS CAGR was -1.7%; below -4.25% the formula returns a negative value)
IV = $365.02
Current price $1,134.38 vs Graham value $365.02 — price is 210.8% above the model value.
DCF:
Free cash flow or share count not available from the data source — no value computed.Data from yfinance summary figures and financial statements, and from the company’s 10-K filings via SEC EDGAR; computed at a price of $1134.38. Every score is calculated from the figures by the framework’s fixed rules, and the explanation beside it is generated from the same figures: Graham value, DCF value, margin of safety, ROIC, profit margins, debt-to-equity, price-to-book, EPS trend, ROE trend, free cash flow, retained earnings and capital allocation. No AI is involved in this scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence, without a score. Read each score with the figures beside it. A check that cannot be scored from the available data is shown as not scored and left out of the composite score. Intrinsic value calculations are model outputs based on stated assumptions, not predictions.
Recent headlines · third-party publishers · not investment advice
The 8 newest headlines whose title names the company, shown automatically and never chosen by Valerius. From third-party publishers via Yahoo Finance, linked to the source. Valerius doesn't write or endorse them. Not investment advice.