CTAS Value Scorecard - Cintas

Value Scorecard · run 2026-10-18

13 value checks: 12 scored 1 to 5, plus moat evidence

44/60

moderate value score

Earnings & returns

EPS Trend

5/5

Diluted EPS: $3.25 (2023), $3.79 (2024), $4.40 (2025), $4.91 (2026). It rose every year; the framework scores that as 5.

ROE Trend

5/5

ROE (net income / common equity): 34.7% (2023), 36.3% (2024), 38.6% (2025), 38.8% (2026). Median 37.4%, lowest 34.7%; the framework scores a median above 20% as 5.

ROIC

5/5

ROIC of 33.2%: operating income of $2.61B divided by $7.84B of capital (total assets $10.53B minus current liabilities $2.69B), fiscal year to May 31, 2026, as filed in the 10-K (SEC EDGAR). The framework scores above 20% as 5.

Profit Margins

4/5

Net margin of 17.8%; the framework scores 10-20% as 4; gross margin 51.0%, operating margin 24.1%.

Balance sheet & cash

Debt-to-Equity

4/5

Debt-to-equity of 0.52; the framework scores 0.3-0.8 as 4 (total debt $2.71B, total cash $364.58M).

Free Cash Flow

5/5

Free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditure): $1.26B (2023), $1.66B (2024), $1.76B (2025), $1.88B (2026). It rose every year; the framework scores that as 5.

Retained Earnings

5/5

Retained earnings, as filed in the 10-Ks (SEC EDGAR): $9.60B (2023), $10.62B (2024), $11.80B (2025), $13.07B (2026). It rose every year; the framework scores that as 5.

Valuation models

Graham IV

2/5

IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y) = $5.07 x (8.5 + 2 x 13.9) x (4.4 / 4.5) = $179.95. Current price $213.69; price is 18.7% above the model value.

DCF Value

1/5

FCF/share = $4.392, stage 1 growth = 8.3% for 5 years, terminal growth = 3%, discount rate = 10%. Stage 1 PV = $20.96, PV of terminal value = $59.78, DCF value = $80.75. Current price $213.69; price is 164.6% above the model value.

Margin of Safety

2/5

Graham value $179.95 (price is 18.7% above the model value); DCF value $80.75 (price is 164.6% above the model value).

Price-to-Book

1/5

P/B of 16.40; the framework scores above 5.0 as 1.

Business quality

Moat Evidence

Not scored

A moat (a brand, a network, switching costs, patents, scale, a licence) is not a number in the filings, so Valerius doesn’t score it. Below are the figures and the words moat analysis starts from, from the company’s own 10-K filings. The conclusion is yours.

Return on capital, each year

Above 15% in 9 of 10 years (2017-2026); lowest 13.5%, highest 33.2%.

Gross margin, each year

Between 44.7% and 50.7% over 10 years (a range of 6.0 points).

Competition, in the company’s own words · 10-K filed Jul 29, 2026

The primary markets served by each of the Cintas operating segments are local in nature and highly fragmented. Cintas competes with national, regional and local providers, large national retailers and small local retailers as well as companies with a significant online presence and the level of competition varies at each of Cintas' local

The opening of the company’s “Competition” section in its 10-K, quoted word for word, not summarized or edited. It is the company’s own description, not Valerius’s view, and may include the company’s expectations. Open the filing.

Return on capital = operating income / (total assets − current liabilities), the ROIC row’s definition; 15% is the framework’s return threshold. Gross margin = gross profit / revenue. Both from each year’s 10-K via SEC EDGAR. Moat analysis commonly looks at whether returns and margins held up over many years. These figures don’t say whether the company has an advantage, what it is, or whether it will last.

Capital Allocation

5/5

Capital allocation, 2023-2026: dividends or buybacks paid in every year (pass); $5.28B paid out against $6.55B of free cash flow (pass); total debt $2.67B to $2.71B, up 1.4%, 0.9x EBITDA (pass: not up more than 10%); shares outstanding 0.41B to 0.40B, down 1.7% (pass). 4 of 4 tests passed; the framework scores that as 5.

Filings

Company notices to the SEC

Not scored

Three kinds of event the company reported to the SEC in the last 5 years, from its filings on SEC EDGAR.

These are events the company reported to the SEC. An auditor change or a late filing can have many causes; each date links to the filing, where the company explains it. Valerius does not score these.

How the Graham and DCF values were calculated

  Graham Formula:
    IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y)
    EPS = $5.07, g = 13.9%, Y = 4.5
    IV = $179.95
    Current price $213.69 vs Graham value $179.95 — price is 18.7% above the model value.

  DCF:
    FCF/share = $4.392
    Stage 1 growth = 8.3% for 5 years | terminal growth = 3.0% | discount rate = 10.0%
      Y1: $4.757 → PV $4.324
      Y2: $5.151 → PV $4.257
      Y3: $5.579 → PV $4.192
      Y4: $6.042 → PV $4.127
      Y5: $6.544 → PV $4.063
    Stage 1 PV sum = $20.96
    Terminal value at end of Y5 = $96.28
    PV of terminal value = $59.78
    DCF value = $80.75
    Current price $213.69 vs DCF value $80.75 — price is 164.6% above the model value.

Data from yfinance summary figures and financial statements, and from the company’s 10-K filings via SEC EDGAR; computed at a price of $213.69. Every score is calculated from the figures by the framework’s fixed rules, and the explanation beside it is generated from the same figures: Graham value, DCF value, margin of safety, ROIC, profit margins, debt-to-equity, price-to-book, EPS trend, ROE trend, free cash flow, retained earnings and capital allocation. No AI is involved in this scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence, without a score. Read each score with the figures beside it. Intrinsic value calculations are model outputs based on stated assumptions, not predictions.

Recent headlines · third-party publishers · not investment advice

In the news

Loading headlines...

The 8 newest headlines whose title names the company, shown automatically and never chosen by Valerius. From third-party publishers via Yahoo Finance, linked to the source. Valerius doesn't write or endorse them. Not investment advice.

CTAS · Cintas

CTAS price