Price · last 3 months · daily close
DLR price
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
ValeriusBeta - Not investment advice
Research · S&P 500 · Real Estate
The numbers, the scorecard and what analysts say, with the source for each. Information, not advice.
Price · last 3 months · daily close
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
Value Scorecard · REIT version · run 2026-10-19
Why this card is different. REITs must pay out most of their taxable income, and depreciation on their buildings lowers the earnings they report. So this card scores funds from operations (FFO) in place of earnings for five of its checks, and capital allocation uses REIT tests. Compare a REIT’s score with other REITs’ scores, not with other companies’: six of its checks are different.
Margin of safety uses the DCF value alone. Everything else is the same as on every card.
Funds from operations. In short: net income with property depreciation added back, and gains or losses from selling property and property write-downs taken out. It is the standard measure REITs report, defined by Nareit, the REIT industry association.
Valerius uses Nareit FFO. Companies also report adjusted versions (AFFO, “normalized” FFO) under their own definitions, which can be higher or lower, so a figure in the news can differ from the one here.
Scored with the REIT version since Oct 2026. The earlier score, 30 of 55, used the standard version, whose checks don't fit how a REIT works. The two scores are not comparable: the method changed.
Earnings & returns
Nareit FFO per diluted share, as reported in the 10-Ks: $6.03 (2022), $6.20 (2023), $6.14 (2024), $6.96 (2025). It rose every year but one and ended above 2022; the framework scores that as 4.
FFO available to common stockholders and unitholders (2) $ 2,399,032 $ 2,027,124 $ 1,915,747
Diluted FFO per share and unit (2)(3) $ 6.96 $ 6.14 $ 6.20Found by AI, checked by codeFrom the company’s 10-K for 2025, filed 2026-02-13 · View the filing
AI found this line in the 10-K. Valerius then checked in code that the line appears in the filing word for word, that it is the plain FFO line (not an adjusted one), and that FFO per share times the diluted share count matches the reported total, or, where no per-share figure is printed, that it is close to FFO built from the filed figures. The score is a fixed rule applied to that figure. No AI sets a score.
Distributions paid (yfinance) over Nareit FFO (10-K): 80% (2022), 79% (2023), 81% (2024), 72% (2025). 72% in 2025; the framework scores 70-80% as 4.
FFO available to common stockholders and unitholders (2) $ 2,399,032 $ 2,027,124 $ 1,915,747
Diluted FFO per share and unit (2)(3) $ 6.96 $ 6.14 $ 6.20Found by AI, checked by codeFrom the company’s 10-K for 2025, filed 2026-02-13 · View the filing
AI found this line in the 10-K. Valerius then checked in code that the line appears in the filing word for word, that it is the plain FFO line (not an adjusted one), and that FFO per share times the diluted share count matches the reported total, or, where no per-share figure is printed, that it is close to FFO built from the filed figures. The score is a fixed rule applied to that figure. No AI sets a score.
Net margin of 11.8%; the framework scores 10-20% as 4; gross margin 57.0%, operating margin 25.9%.
Balance sheet & cash
Total debt over total assets (yfinance balance sheets): 43.6% (2022), 43.0% (2023), 39.8% (2024), 39.8% (2025). 39.8% in 2025; the framework scores 30-40% as 4.
Debt-to-equity of 0.68; the framework scores 0.3-0.8 as 4 (total debt $20.07B, total cash $1.91B).
Free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditure): $1.66B (2022), $1.63B (2023), $2.26B (2024), $2.41B (2025). It rose every year but one and ended above 2022; the framework scores that as 4.
FFO kept after distributions (Nareit FFO from the 10-Ks minus distributions paid, yfinance): $368.76M (2022), $395.10M (2023), $393.88M (2024), $670.57M (2025). It rose every year but one and ended above 2022; the framework scores that as 4.
FFO available to common stockholders and unitholders (2) $ 2,399,032 $ 2,027,124 $ 1,915,747
Diluted FFO per share and unit (2)(3) $ 6.96 $ 6.14 $ 6.20Found by AI, checked by codeFrom the company’s 10-K for 2025, filed 2026-02-13 · View the filing
AI found this line in the 10-K. Valerius then checked in code that the line appears in the filing word for word, that it is the plain FFO line (not an adjusted one), and that FFO per share times the diluted share count matches the reported total, or, where no per-share figure is printed, that it is close to FFO built from the filed figures. The score is a fixed rule applied to that figure. No AI sets a score.
Valuation models
Price $173.00 over 2025 FFO per share of $6.96 (as reported in the 10-K) = 24.9; the framework scores 20-25 as 2.
FFO available to common stockholders and unitholders (2) $ 2,399,032 $ 2,027,124 $ 1,915,747
Diluted FFO per share and unit (2)(3) $ 6.96 $ 6.14 $ 6.20Found by AI, checked by codeFrom the company’s 10-K for 2025, filed 2026-02-13 · View the filing
AI found this line in the 10-K. Valerius then checked in code that the line appears in the filing word for word, that it is the plain FFO line (not an adjusted one), and that FFO per share times the diluted share count matches the reported total, or, where no per-share figure is printed, that it is close to FFO built from the filed figures. The score is a fixed rule applied to that figure. No AI sets a score.
FCF/share = $10.158, stage 1 growth = 5.6% for 5 years, terminal growth = 3%, discount rate = 10%. Stage 1 PV = $45.01, PV of terminal value = $121.87, DCF value = $166.88. Current price $173.00; price is 3.7% above the model value.
From the DCF value alone in the REIT version: DCF value $166.88; price is 3.7% above the model value.
P/B of 2.40; the framework scores 1.5-3.0 as 3.
Business quality
A moat (a brand, a network, switching costs, patents, scale, a licence) is not a number in the filings, so Valerius doesn’t score it. Below are the figures and the words moat analysis starts from, from the company’s own 10-K filings. The conclusion is yours.
Return on capital, each year
Not available: the 10-K financial data has no standard figures for operating income, total assets and current liabilities in the same years, as is common for banks, insurers and REITs.
Gross margin, each year
Not reported: the filings don’t state a gross profit or cost of revenue figure, as is common for oil and gas companies, banks and insurers.
Competition, in the company’s own words · 10-K filed Feb 13, 2026
We compete with numerous data center providers globally, many of whom own or operate properties similar to ours in some of the same metropolitan areas where our data centers are located, including Equinix, Inc. and NTT; various private operators in the U.S.; as well as Global Switch Holdings Limited and various regional operators in Europe, Asia, Latin America, Africa and Australia. See "We face significant competition, which may adversely affect the occupancy and rental rates of our data centers." in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The opening of the company’s “Competition” section in its 10-K, quoted word for word, not summarized or edited. It is the company’s own description, not Valerius’s view, and may include the company’s expectations. Open the filing.
Return on capital = operating income / (total assets − current liabilities), the ROIC row’s definition; 15% is the framework’s return threshold. Gross margin = gross profit / revenue. Both from each year’s 10-K via SEC EDGAR. Moat analysis commonly looks at whether returns and margins held up over many years. These figures don’t say whether the company has an advantage, what it is, or whether it will last.
Capital allocation (REIT), 2022-2025: distributions paid in every year (pass); distributions covered by FFO every year (pass); debt to total assets 43.6% to 39.8% (pass: up no more than 5 points); shares outstanding up 18.0%, FFO per share $6.03 to $6.96 (pass). 4 of 4 tests passed; the framework scores that as 5.
Filings
Three kinds of event the company reported to the SEC in the last 5 years, from its filings on SEC EDGAR.
Loading...
These are events the company reported to the SEC. An auditor change or a late filing can have many causes; each date links to the filing, where the company explains it. Valerius does not score these.
Graham Formula:
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y)
EPS = $2.06, g = 11.5%, Y = 4.5
IV = $63.45
Current price $173.00 vs Graham value $63.45 — price is 172.7% above the model value.
DCF:
FCF/share = $10.158
Stage 1 growth = 5.6% for 5 years | terminal growth = 3.0% | discount rate = 10.0%
Y1: $10.726 → PV $9.751
Y2: $11.327 → PV $9.361
Y3: $11.962 → PV $8.987
Y4: $12.631 → PV $8.627
Y5: $13.339 → PV $8.282
Stage 1 PV sum = $45.01
Terminal value at end of Y5 = $196.27
PV of terminal value = $121.87
DCF value = $166.88
Current price $173.00 vs DCF value $166.88 — price is 3.7% above the model value.Data from yfinance summary figures and financial statements, and from the company’s 10-K filings via SEC EDGAR; computed at a price of $173.00. Every score is calculated from the figures by the framework’s fixed rules, and the explanation beside it is generated from the same figures: FFO per share trend, FFO payout ratio, debt to total assets, debt-to-equity, free cash flow, profit margins, FFO kept after distributions, price-to-FFO, DCF value, margin of safety, price-to-book and capital allocation (the REIT version). FFO figures were found in the 10-K filings by AI and checked in code before use; no AI sets a score. The moat is shown as evidence, without a score. Read each score with the figures beside it. Intrinsic value calculations are model outputs based on stated assumptions, not predictions.
Recent headlines · third-party publishers · not investment advice
The 8 newest headlines whose title names the company, shown automatically and never chosen by Valerius. From third-party publishers via Yahoo Finance, linked to the source. Valerius doesn't write or endorse them. Not investment advice.