Price · last 3 months · daily close
HCA price
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
ValeriusBeta - Not investment advice
Research · S&P 500 · Health Care
The numbers, the scorecard and what analysts say, with the source for each. Information, not advice.
Price · last 3 months · daily close
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
Value Scorecard · run 2026-10-18
11 of the 12 checks that carry a score were scored from the data available. 1 could not be scored (ROE Trend) and was left out, so the score is out of 55 instead of 60. The label uses the same share of the available points as for a full scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence from the filings, without a score.
Earnings & returns
Diluted EPS: $19.15 (2022), $18.97 (2023), $22.00 (2024), $28.33 (2025). It rose every year but one and ended above 2022; the framework scores that as 4.
Shareholder equity is negative in 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, so ROE has no meaningful value and is not scored.
ROIC of 27.2%: earnings before interest and taxes of $12.08B (pre-tax income $9.83B plus interest expense $2.25B; the 10-K's financial data has no standard operating income figure) divided by $44.37B of capital (total assets $60.72B minus current liabilities $16.35B), fiscal year to Dec 31, 2025, as filed in the 10-K (SEC EDGAR). The framework scores above 20% as 5.
Net margin of 8.8%; the framework scores 5-10% as 3; gross margin 42.6%, operating margin 15.2%.
Balance sheet & cash
Shareholder equity is negative, so debt-to-equity has no meaningful value (total debt $51.55B, total cash $1.13B). The framework scores negative equity as 1. Calculated from the balance sheet in yfinance (at Jun 30, 2026) because yfinance's summary figure was not available.
Free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditure): $4.13B (2022), $4.69B (2023), $5.64B (2024), $7.69B (2025). It rose every year; the framework scores that as 5.
Retained earnings, as filed in the 10-Ks (SEC EDGAR): -$2.28B (2022), -$1.35B (2023), -$2.12B (2024), -$5.72B (2025). The latest balance is negative (an accumulated deficit); the framework scores that as 1.
Valuation models
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y) = $29.83 x (8.5 + 2 x 20.0) x (4.4 / 4.5) = $1,414.60 (EPS CAGR 22.2% capped at 20%). Current price $458.84; price is 67.6% below the model value.
FCF/share = $16.851, stage 1 growth = 7.9% for 5 years, terminal growth = 3%, discount rate = 10%. Stage 1 PV = $79.55, PV of terminal value = $225.16, DCF value = $304.71. Current price $458.84; price is 50.6% above the model value.
Graham value $1,414.60 (price is 67.6% below the model value); DCF value $304.71 (price is 50.6% above the model value).
Book value is negative; the framework scores negative book value as 1.
Business quality
A moat (a brand, a network, switching costs, patents, scale, a licence) is not a number in the filings, so Valerius doesn’t score it. Below are the figures and the words moat analysis starts from, from the company’s own 10-K filings. The conclusion is yours.
Return on capital, each year
Above 15% in 10 of 10 years (2016-2025); lowest 18.1%, highest 27.7%.
Gross margin, each year
Not reported: the filings don’t state a gross profit or cost of revenue figure, as is common for oil and gas companies, banks and insurers.
Competition, in the company’s own words · 10-K filed Feb 10, 2026
Generally, other hospitals and facilities in the communities we serve provide services similar to those we offer. Additionally, the number of freestanding specialty hospitals, surgery centers, emergency departments, urgent care centers, diagnostic and imaging centers and other medical facilities in the geographic areas in which we operate continues to increase. As a result, most of our hospitals and other facilities operate in a highly competitive environment. In some cases, competing facilities are more established than we are. Some competing facilities are physician-owned or are owned by tax-supported government agencies, and many others are owned by not-for-profit entities that may be supported by endowments, charitable contributions and/or tax revenues and are exempt from sales, property and income taxes. Such exemptions and support are not available to our facilities and may provide the tax-supported or not-for-profit entities an advantage in funding capital expenditures. In certain localities, there are large teaching hospitals that provide highly specialized facilities, equipment and services that may not be available at most of our hospitals. We also face competition from specialty hospitals and from both our own and unaffiliated freestanding ASCs for market share in certain high margin services.
The opening of the company’s “Competition” section in its 10-K, quoted word for word, not summarized or edited. It is the company’s own description, not Valerius’s view, and may include the company’s expectations. Open the filing.
Return on capital = operating income / (total assets − current liabilities), the ROIC row’s definition; 15% is the framework’s return threshold. For a year whose 10-K financial data has no standard operating income figure, earnings before interest and taxes (pre-tax income plus interest expense) is used. Gross margin = gross profit / revenue. Both from each year’s 10-K via SEC EDGAR. Moat analysis commonly looks at whether returns and margins held up over many years. These figures don’t say whether the company has an advantage, what it is, or whether it will last.
Capital allocation, 2022-2025: dividends or buybacks paid in every year (pass); $29.60B paid out against $22.14B of free cash flow (fail: paid out more than free cash flow); total debt $40.20B to $48.70B, up 21.1%, 3.1x EBITDA (fail: up more than 10% and above 2x EBITDA); shares outstanding 0.28B to 0.22B, down 19.0% (pass). 2 of 4 tests passed; the framework scores that as 3.
Filings
Three kinds of event the company reported to the SEC in the last 5 years, from its filings on SEC EDGAR.
Loading...
These are events the company reported to the SEC. An auditor change or a late filing can have many causes; each date links to the filing, where the company explains it. Valerius does not score these.
Graham Formula:
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y)
EPS = $29.83, g = 20.0%, Y = 4.5
g capped at 20.0% (3-year EPS CAGR was 22.2%)
IV = $1,414.60
Current price $458.84 vs Graham value $1,414.60 — price is 67.6% below the model value.
DCF:
FCF/share = $16.851
Stage 1 growth = 7.9% for 5 years | terminal growth = 3.0% | discount rate = 10.0%
Y1: $18.182 → PV $16.529
Y2: $19.618 → PV $16.213
Y3: $21.168 → PV $15.904
Y4: $22.840 → PV $15.600
Y5: $24.645 → PV $15.302
Stage 1 PV sum = $79.55
Terminal value at end of Y5 = $362.63
PV of terminal value = $225.16
DCF value = $304.71
Current price $458.84 vs DCF value $304.71 — price is 50.6% above the model value.Data from yfinance summary figures and financial statements, and from the company’s 10-K filings via SEC EDGAR; computed at a price of $458.84. Every score is calculated from the figures by the framework’s fixed rules, and the explanation beside it is generated from the same figures: Graham value, DCF value, margin of safety, ROIC, profit margins, debt-to-equity, price-to-book, EPS trend, ROE trend, free cash flow, retained earnings and capital allocation. No AI is involved in this scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence, without a score. Read each score with the figures beside it. A check that cannot be scored from the available data is shown as not scored and left out of the composite score. Intrinsic value calculations are model outputs based on stated assumptions, not predictions.
Recent headlines · third-party publishers · not investment advice
The 8 newest headlines whose title names the company, shown automatically and never chosen by Valerius. From third-party publishers via Yahoo Finance, linked to the source. Valerius doesn't write or endorse them. Not investment advice.