Price · last 3 months · daily close
HIG price
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
ValeriusBeta - Not investment advice
Research · S&P 500 · Financials
The numbers, the scorecard and what analysts say, with the source for each. Information, not advice.
Price · last 3 months · daily close
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
Value Scorecard · run 2026-10-18
11 of the 12 checks that carry a score were scored from the data available. 1 could not be scored (ROIC) and was left out, so the score is out of 55 instead of 60. The label uses the same share of the available points as for a full scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence from the filings, without a score.
Earnings & returns
Diluted EPS: $5.44 (2022), $7.97 (2023), $10.35 (2024), $13.32 (2025). It rose every year; the framework scores that as 5.
ROE (net income / common equity): 13.5% (2022), 16.6% (2023), 19.2% (2024), 20.5% (2025). Median 17.9%, lowest 13.5%; the framework scores a median 15-20% as 4.
ROIC not available: the 10-K financial data filed with the SEC has no standard operating income figure (or pre-tax income and interest expense), total assets and current liabilities for the same fiscal year.
Net margin of 14.9%; the framework scores 10-20% as 4; gross margin 37.9%, operating margin 17.6%.
Balance sheet & cash
Debt-to-equity of 0.22; the framework scores below 0.3 as 5 (total debt $4.38B, total cash $3.99B).
Free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditure): $3.83B (2022), $4.00B (2023), $5.76B (2024), $5.75B (2025). It rose every year but one and ended above 2022; the framework scores that as 4.
Retained earnings, as filed in the 10-Ks (SEC EDGAR): $17.06B (2022), $19.01B (2023), $21.53B (2024), $24.74B (2025). It rose every year; the framework scores that as 5.
Valuation models
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y) = $14.01 x (8.5 + 2 x 20.0) x (4.4 / 4.5) = $664.39 (EPS CAGR 29.3% capped at 20%). Current price $135.12; price is 79.7% below the model value.
FCF/share = $20.332, stage 1 growth = 7.4% for 5 years, terminal growth = 3%, discount rate = 10%. Stage 1 PV = $94.68, PV of terminal value = $265.45, DCF value = $360.13. Current price $135.12; price is 62.5% below the model value.
Graham value $664.39 (price is 79.7% below the model value); DCF value $360.13 (price is 62.5% below the model value).
P/B of 1.90; the framework scores 1.5-3.0 as 3.
Business quality
A moat (a brand, a network, switching costs, patents, scale, a licence) is not a number in the filings, so Valerius doesn’t score it. Below are the figures and the words moat analysis starts from, from the company’s own 10-K filings. The conclusion is yours.
Return on capital, each year
Not available: the 10-K financial data has no standard figures for operating income, total assets and current liabilities in the same years, as is common for banks, insurers and REITs.
Gross margin, each year
Not reported: the filings don’t state a gross profit or cost of revenue figure, as is common for oil and gas companies, banks and insurers.
Competition, in the company’s own words · 10-K filed Feb 20, 2026
In small business, The Hartford competes against large national carriers, regional carriers and direct writers. Competitors include stock companies, mutual companies and other underwriting organizations. The small business market remains highly competitive and fragmented as carriers seek to differentiate themselves through product expansion, price, enhanced service and leading technology. Larger carriers such as The Hartford are continually advancing their pricing sophistication and ease of doing business with agents and customers through the use of technology, analytics and other capabilities that improve the process of evaluating a risk, quoting new business and servicing customers. The Company also continuously enhances digital capabilities as customers and distributors demand more access and convenience, and expands product and underwriting capabilities to accommodate both larger accounts and a broader risk appetite. Existing competitors and new entrants, including start-up and non-traditional carriers, are actively looking to expand sales of business insurance products to small businesses through increasing their underwriting appetite, deepening their relationships with distribution partners, leveraging emerging artificial intelligence capabilities, and through on-line and direct-to-consumer marketing. Carriers that can quote business in an automated way have a competitive advantage by shortening the time from quoting to issuance.
The opening of the company’s “Competition” section in its 10-K, quoted word for word, not summarized or edited. It is the company’s own description, not Valerius’s view, and may include the company’s expectations. Open the filing.
Return on capital = operating income / (total assets − current liabilities), the ROIC row’s definition; 15% is the framework’s return threshold. Gross margin = gross profit / revenue. Both from each year’s 10-K via SEC EDGAR. Moat analysis commonly looks at whether returns and margins held up over many years. These figures don’t say whether the company has an advantage, what it is, or whether it will last.
Capital allocation, 2022-2025: dividends or buybacks paid in every year (pass); $8.35B paid out against $19.36B of free cash flow (pass); total debt $4.36B to $4.37B, up 0.3% (pass: not up more than 10%); shares outstanding 0.32B to 0.28B, down 12.1% (pass). 4 of 4 tests passed; the framework scores that as 5.
Filings
Three kinds of event the company reported to the SEC in the last 5 years, from its filings on SEC EDGAR.
Loading...
These are events the company reported to the SEC. An auditor change or a late filing can have many causes; each date links to the filing, where the company explains it. Valerius does not score these.
Graham Formula:
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y)
EPS = $14.01, g = 20.0%, Y = 4.5
g capped at 20.0% (3-year EPS CAGR was 29.3%)
IV = $664.39
Current price $135.12 vs Graham value $664.39 — price is 79.7% below the model value.
DCF:
FCF/share = $20.332
Stage 1 growth = 7.4% for 5 years | terminal growth = 3.0% | discount rate = 10.0%
Y1: $21.837 → PV $19.852
Y2: $23.453 → PV $19.383
Y3: $25.189 → PV $18.925
Y4: $27.053 → PV $18.477
Y5: $29.054 → PV $18.040
Stage 1 PV sum = $94.68
Terminal value at end of Y5 = $427.51
PV of terminal value = $265.45
DCF value = $360.13
Current price $135.12 vs DCF value $360.13 — price is 62.5% below the model value.Data from yfinance summary figures and financial statements, and from the company’s 10-K filings via SEC EDGAR; computed at a price of $135.12. Every score is calculated from the figures by the framework’s fixed rules, and the explanation beside it is generated from the same figures: Graham value, DCF value, margin of safety, ROIC, profit margins, debt-to-equity, price-to-book, EPS trend, ROE trend, free cash flow, retained earnings and capital allocation. No AI is involved in this scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence, without a score. Read each score with the figures beside it. A check that cannot be scored from the available data is shown as not scored and left out of the composite score. Intrinsic value calculations are model outputs based on stated assumptions, not predictions.
Recent headlines · third-party publishers · not investment advice
The 8 newest headlines whose title names the company, shown automatically and never chosen by Valerius. From third-party publishers via Yahoo Finance, linked to the source. Valerius doesn't write or endorse them. Not investment advice.