Price · last 3 months · daily close
HST price
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
ValeriusBeta - Not investment advice
Research · S&P 500 · Real Estate
The numbers, the scorecard and what analysts say, with the source for each. Information, not advice.
Price · last 3 months · daily close
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
Value Scorecard · REIT version · run 2026-10-19
Why this card is different. REITs must pay out most of their taxable income, and depreciation on their buildings lowers the earnings they report. So this card scores funds from operations (FFO) in place of earnings for five of its checks, and capital allocation uses REIT tests. Compare a REIT’s score with other REITs’ scores, not with other companies’: six of its checks are different.
Margin of safety uses the DCF value alone. Everything else is the same as on every card.
Funds from operations. In short: net income with property depreciation added back, and gains or losses from selling property and property write-downs taken out. It is the standard measure REITs report, defined by Nareit, the REIT industry association.
Valerius uses Nareit FFO. Companies also report adjusted versions (AFFO, “normalized” FFO) under their own definitions, which can be higher or lower, so a figure in the news can differ from the one here.
Scored with the REIT version since Oct 2026. The earlier score, 34 of 55, used the standard version, whose checks don't fit how a REIT works. The two scores are not comparable: the method changed.
Earnings & returns
Nareit FFO per diluted share, as reported in the 10-Ks: $1.79 (2022), $1.92 (2023), $1.97 (2024), $2.03 (2025). It rose every year; the framework scores that as 5.
NAREIT FFO 1,410 1,387
NAREIT FFO per diluted share $ 2.03 $ 1.97Found by AI, checked by codeFrom the company’s 10-K for 2025, filed 2026-02-25 · View the filing
AI found this line in the 10-K. Valerius then checked in code that the line appears in the filing word for word, that it is the plain FFO line (not an adjusted one), and that FFO per share times the diluted share count matches the reported total, or, where no per-share figure is printed, that it is close to FFO built from the filed figures. The score is a fixed rule applied to that figure. No AI sets a score.
Distributions paid (yfinance) over Nareit FFO (10-K): 12% (2022), 40% (2023), 53% (2024), 44% (2025). 44% in 2025; the framework scores 70% or less as 5.
NAREIT FFO 1,410 1,387
NAREIT FFO per diluted share $ 2.03 $ 1.97Found by AI, checked by codeFrom the company’s 10-K for 2025, filed 2026-02-25 · View the filing
AI found this line in the 10-K. Valerius then checked in code that the line appears in the filing word for word, that it is the plain FFO line (not an adjusted one), and that FFO per share times the diluted share count matches the reported total, or, where no per-share figure is printed, that it is close to FFO built from the filed figures. The score is a fixed rule applied to that figure. No AI sets a score.
Net margin of 16.5%; the framework scores 10-20% as 4; gross margin 29.2%, operating margin 18.2%.
Balance sheet & cash
Total debt over total assets (yfinance balance sheets): 39.0% (2022), 39.0% (2023), 43.2% (2024), 43.2% (2025). 43.2% in 2025; the framework scores 40-50% as 3.
Debt-to-equity of 0.85; the framework scores 0.8-1.5 as 3 (total debt $5.65B, total cash $1.95B).
Free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditure): $912.00M (2022), $795.00M (2023), $950.00M (2024), $866.00M (2025). It ended at or below 2022; the framework scores that as 2.
FFO kept after distributions (Nareit FFO from the 10-Ks minus distributions paid, yfinance): $1.14B (2022), $819.00M (2023), $650.00M (2024), $787.00M (2025). It ended at or below 2022; the framework scores that as 2.
NAREIT FFO 1,410 1,387
NAREIT FFO per diluted share $ 2.03 $ 1.97Found by AI, checked by codeFrom the company’s 10-K for 2025, filed 2026-02-25 · View the filing
AI found this line in the 10-K. Valerius then checked in code that the line appears in the filing word for word, that it is the plain FFO line (not an adjusted one), and that FFO per share times the diluted share count matches the reported total, or, where no per-share figure is printed, that it is close to FFO built from the filed figures. The score is a fixed rule applied to that figure. No AI sets a score.
Valuation models
Price $24.19 over 2025 FFO per share of $2.03 (as reported in the 10-K) = 11.9; the framework scores under 12 as 5.
NAREIT FFO 1,410 1,387
NAREIT FFO per diluted share $ 2.03 $ 1.97Found by AI, checked by codeFrom the company’s 10-K for 2025, filed 2026-02-25 · View the filing
AI found this line in the 10-K. Valerius then checked in code that the line appears in the filing word for word, that it is the plain FFO line (not an adjusted one), and that FFO per share times the diluted share count matches the reported total, or, where no per-share figure is printed, that it is close to FFO built from the filed figures. The score is a fixed rule applied to that figure. No AI sets a score.
FCF/share = $2.470, stage 1 growth = 7.3% for 5 years, terminal growth = 3%, discount rate = 10%. Stage 1 PV = $11.47, PV of terminal value = $32.10, DCF value = $43.57. Current price $24.19; price is 44.5% below the model value.
From the DCF value alone in the REIT version: DCF value $43.57; price is 44.5% below the model value.
P/B of 2.59; the framework scores 1.5-3.0 as 3.
Business quality
A moat (a brand, a network, switching costs, patents, scale, a licence) is not a number in the filings, so Valerius doesn’t score it. Below are the figures and the words moat analysis starts from, from the company’s own 10-K filings. The conclusion is yours.
Return on capital, each year
Not available: the 10-K financial data has no standard figures for operating income, total assets and current liabilities in the same years, as is common for banks, insurers and REITs.
Gross margin, each year
Not reported: the filings don’t state a gross profit or cost of revenue figure, as is common for oil and gas companies, banks and insurers.
Competition, in the company’s own words · 10-K filed Feb 25, 2026
The lodging industry is highly competitive. Competition often is specific to individual markets and is based on several factors, including location, brand, guest facilities and amenities, level of service, room rates and the quality of accommodations. The lodging industry is viewed as consisting of six different categories, each of which caters to a discrete set of customer tastes and needs: luxury, upper upscale, upscale, upper midscale, midscale and economy. The classification of a hotel is based on lodging industry standards, which take into consideration many factors, such as guest facilities and amenities, level of service and quality of accommodations. Most of our hotels operate in urban and resort markets either as luxury properties under such brand names as 1 Hotels ® , Alila ® , Andaz ® , Fairmont ® , Grand Hyatt ® , JW Marriott ® , Ritz-Carlton ® , The Don Cesar ® , The Luxury Collection ® and W ® , or as upper upscale properties under such brand names as Autograph Collection ® , Curio – A Collection by Hilton ® , Embassy Suites by Hilton ® , Hyatt Regency ® , Marriott ® , Marriott Marquis ® , Swissôtel ® , Tribute Portfolio ® and Westin ® . 1 While our hotels compete primarily with other hotels in the luxury and upper upscale category, they also may compete with hotels in other lower-tier categories. A recent source of supply for the lodging industry has been the rapid growth of online short-term rentals, including as a flexible option for apartment buildings.
The opening of the company’s “Competition” section in its 10-K, quoted word for word, not summarized or edited. It is the company’s own description, not Valerius’s view, and may include the company’s expectations. Open the filing.
Return on capital = operating income / (total assets − current liabilities), the ROIC row’s definition; 15% is the framework’s return threshold. Gross margin = gross profit / revenue. Both from each year’s 10-K via SEC EDGAR. Moat analysis commonly looks at whether returns and margins held up over many years. These figures don’t say whether the company has an advantage, what it is, or whether it will last.
Capital allocation (REIT), 2022-2025: distributions paid in every year (pass); distributions covered by FFO every year (pass); debt to total assets 39.0% to 43.2% (pass: up no more than 5 points); shares outstanding down 3.6% (pass). 4 of 4 tests passed; the framework scores that as 5.
Filings
Three kinds of event the company reported to the SEC in the last 5 years, from its filings on SEC EDGAR.
Loading...
These are events the company reported to the SEC. An auditor change or a late filing can have many causes; each date links to the filing, where the company explains it. Valerius does not score these.
Graham Formula:
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y)
EPS = $1.48, g = 2.8%, Y = 4.5
IV = $20.40
Current price $24.19 vs Graham value $20.40 — price is 18.6% above the model value.
DCF:
FCF/share = $2.470
Stage 1 growth = 7.3% for 5 years | terminal growth = 3.0% | discount rate = 10.0%
Y1: $2.650 → PV $2.410
Y2: $2.844 → PV $2.350
Y3: $3.052 → PV $2.293
Y4: $3.274 → PV $2.236
Y5: $3.513 → PV $2.182
Stage 1 PV sum = $11.47
Terminal value at end of Y5 = $51.70
PV of terminal value = $32.10
DCF value = $43.57
Current price $24.19 vs DCF value $43.57 — price is 44.5% below the model value.Data from yfinance summary figures and financial statements, and from the company’s 10-K filings via SEC EDGAR; computed at a price of $24.19. Every score is calculated from the figures by the framework’s fixed rules, and the explanation beside it is generated from the same figures: FFO per share trend, FFO payout ratio, debt to total assets, debt-to-equity, free cash flow, profit margins, FFO kept after distributions, price-to-FFO, DCF value, margin of safety, price-to-book and capital allocation (the REIT version). FFO figures were found in the 10-K filings by AI and checked in code before use; no AI sets a score. The moat is shown as evidence, without a score. Read each score with the figures beside it. Intrinsic value calculations are model outputs based on stated assumptions, not predictions.
Recent headlines · third-party publishers · not investment advice
The 8 newest headlines whose title names the company, shown automatically and never chosen by Valerius. From third-party publishers via Yahoo Finance, linked to the source. Valerius doesn't write or endorse them. Not investment advice.