Price · last 3 months · daily close
LOW price
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
ValeriusBeta - Not investment advice
Research · S&P 500 · Consumer Discretionary
The numbers, the scorecard and what analysts say, with the source for each. Information, not advice.
Price · last 3 months · daily close
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
Value Scorecard · run 2026-10-18
11 of the 12 checks that carry a score were scored from the data available. 1 could not be scored (ROE Trend) and was left out, so the score is out of 55 instead of 60. The label uses the same share of the available points as for a full scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence from the filings, without a score.
Earnings & returns
Diluted EPS: $10.17 (2023), $13.20 (2024), $12.23 (2025), $11.85 (2026). It ended above 2023 but did not rise in 2 of 3 years; the framework scores that as 3.
Shareholder equity is negative in 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, so ROE has no meaningful value and is not scored.
ROIC of 29.3%: operating income of $10.15B divided by $34.68B of capital (total assets $54.14B minus current liabilities $19.46B), fiscal year to Jan 30, 2026, as filed in the 10-K (SEC EDGAR). The framework scores above 20% as 5.
Net margin of 7.3%; the framework scores 5-10% as 3; gross margin 33.0%, operating margin 13.4%.
Balance sheet & cash
Shareholder equity is negative, so debt-to-equity has no meaningful value (total debt $42.03B, total cash $3.17B). The framework scores negative equity as 1. Calculated from the balance sheet in yfinance (at Jul 31, 2026) because yfinance's summary figure was not available.
Free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditure): $6.76B (2023), $6.18B (2024), $7.70B (2025), $7.65B (2026). It ended above 2023 but did not rise in 2 of 3 years; the framework scores that as 3.
Retained earnings, as filed in the 10-Ks (SEC EDGAR): -$14.86B (2023), -$15.64B (2024), -$14.80B (2025), -$10.84B (2026). The latest balance is negative (an accumulated deficit); the framework scores that as 1.
Valuation models
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y) = $11.83 x (8.5 + 2 x 0.0) x (4.4 / 4.5) = $98.32 (EPS CAGR -5.3% floored at 0%; the formula returns a negative value below -4.25% growth). Current price $197.38; price is 100.8% above the model value.
FCF/share = $8.226, stage 1 growth = 0.0% (revenue CAGR -0.1% floored at 0%; the company is valued as if it does not grow rather than extrapolating the decline) for 5 years, terminal growth = 3%, discount rate = 10%. Stage 1 PV = $31.18, PV of terminal value = $75.16, DCF value = $106.34. Current price $197.38; price is 85.6% above the model value.
Graham value $98.32 (price is 100.8% above the model value); DCF value $106.34 (price is 85.6% above the model value).
Book value is negative; the framework scores negative book value as 1.
Business quality
A moat (a brand, a network, switching costs, patents, scale, a licence) is not a number in the filings, so Valerius doesn’t score it. Below are the figures and the words moat analysis starts from, from the company’s own 10-K filings. The conclusion is yours.
Return on capital, each year
Above 15% in 10 of 10 years (2017-2026); lowest 20.1%, highest 48.4%.
Gross margin, each year
Between 31.8% and 33.5% over 10 years (a range of 1.7 points).
Competition, in the company’s own words · 10-K filed Mar 23, 2026
The home improvement industry includes a broad competitive landscape that continues to evolve. We compete with national and regional home improvement warehouse chains and lumber yards in most of the markets we serve. We also compete with traditional hardware, plumbing, electrical, drywall and home supply retailers and distributors, as well as paint stores, lumber yards, garden centers, and maintenance and repair organizations. In addition, we compete with general merchandise retailers, home goods specialty stores, warehouse clubs, online retailers, other specialty retailers, providers of equipment and tool rental, service providers that install home improvement products, and wholesalers that provide home-related products and services to homeowners, renters, businesses, and the government. Location of stores and branches, product assortment, product pricing, fulfillment capabilities, and customer service continue to be key competitive factors in our industry, while the evolution of technology, including artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies and customer expectations also underscore the importance of omnichannel capabilities as a competitive factor. See further discussion of competition in Item 1A , “Risk Factors”, of this Annual Report.
The opening of the company’s “Our Competition” section in its 10-K, quoted word for word, not summarized or edited. It is the company’s own description, not Valerius’s view, and may include the company’s expectations. Open the filing.
Return on capital = operating income / (total assets − current liabilities), the ROIC row’s definition; 15% is the framework’s return threshold. Gross margin = gross profit / revenue. Both from each year’s 10-K via SEC EDGAR. Moat analysis commonly looks at whether returns and margins held up over many years. These figures don’t say whether the company has an advantage, what it is, or whether it will last.
Capital allocation, 2023-2026: dividends or buybacks paid in every year (pass); $34.63B paid out against $28.29B of free cash flow (fail: paid out more than free cash flow); total debt $37.99B to $44.68B, up 17.6%, 3.6x EBITDA (fail: up more than 10% and above 2x EBITDA); shares outstanding 0.60B to 0.56B, down 6.7% (pass). 2 of 4 tests passed; the framework scores that as 3.
Filings
Three kinds of event the company reported to the SEC in the last 5 years, from its filings on SEC EDGAR.
Loading...
These are events the company reported to the SEC. An auditor change or a late filing can have many causes; each date links to the filing, where the company explains it. Valerius does not score these.
Graham Formula:
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y)
EPS = $11.83, g = 0.0%, Y = 4.5
g floored at 0.0% (3-year EPS CAGR was -5.3%; below -4.25% the formula returns a negative value)
IV = $98.32
Current price $197.38 vs Graham value $98.32 — price is 100.8% above the model value.
DCF:
FCF/share = $8.226
Stage 1 growth = 0.0% for 5 years | terminal growth = 3.0% | discount rate = 10.0%
Stage 1 g floored at 0.0% (3-year revenue CAGR was -0.1%; the company is valued as if it does not grow rather than extrapolating the decline)
Y1: $8.226 → PV $7.478
Y2: $8.226 → PV $6.799
Y3: $8.226 → PV $6.181
Y4: $8.226 → PV $5.619
Y5: $8.226 → PV $5.108
Stage 1 PV sum = $31.18
Terminal value at end of Y5 = $121.04
PV of terminal value = $75.16
DCF value = $106.34
Current price $197.38 vs DCF value $106.34 — price is 85.6% above the model value.Data from yfinance summary figures and financial statements, and from the company’s 10-K filings via SEC EDGAR; computed at a price of $197.38. Every score is calculated from the figures by the framework’s fixed rules, and the explanation beside it is generated from the same figures: Graham value, DCF value, margin of safety, ROIC, profit margins, debt-to-equity, price-to-book, EPS trend, ROE trend, free cash flow, retained earnings and capital allocation. No AI is involved in this scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence, without a score. Read each score with the figures beside it. A check that cannot be scored from the available data is shown as not scored and left out of the composite score. Intrinsic value calculations are model outputs based on stated assumptions, not predictions.
Recent headlines · third-party publishers · not investment advice
The 8 newest headlines whose title names the company, shown automatically and never chosen by Valerius. From third-party publishers via Yahoo Finance, linked to the source. Valerius doesn't write or endorse them. Not investment advice.