QCOM Value Scorecard - Qualcomm

Value Scorecard · run 2026-10-18

13 value checks: 12 scored 1 to 5, plus moat evidence

43/60

moderate value score

Earnings & returns

EPS Trend

1/5

Diluted EPS: $11.37 (2022), $6.42 (2023), $8.97 (2024), $5.01 (2025). The latest figure is half the 2022 figure or less; the framework scores that as 1.

ROE Trend

5/5

ROE (net income / common equity): 71.8% (2022), 33.5% (2023), 38.6% (2024), 26.1% (2025). Median 36.1%, lowest 26.1%; the framework scores a median above 20% as 5.

ROIC

5/5

ROIC of 30.1%: operating income of $12.36B divided by $41.00B of capital (total assets $50.14B minus current liabilities $9.14B), fiscal year to Sep 28, 2025, as filed in the 10-K (SEC EDGAR). The framework scores above 20% as 5.

Profit Margins

5/5

Net margin of 21.0%; the framework scores above 20% as 5; gross margin 54.2%, operating margin 18.5%.

Balance sheet & cash

Debt-to-Equity

4/5

Debt-to-equity of 0.55; the framework scores 0.3-0.8 as 4 (total debt $15.27B, total cash $8.30B).

Free Cash Flow

5/5

Free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditure): $6.83B (2022), $9.85B (2023), $11.16B (2024), $12.82B (2025). It rose every year; the framework scores that as 5.

Retained Earnings

4/5

Retained earnings, as filed in the 10-Ks (SEC EDGAR): $17.84B (2022), $20.73B (2023), $25.69B (2024), $20.65B (2025). It rose every year but one and ended above 2022; the framework scores that as 4.

Valuation models

Graham IV

1/5

IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y) = $8.64 x (8.5 + 2 x 0.0) x (4.4 / 4.5) = $71.81 (EPS CAGR -11.7% floored at 0%; the formula returns a negative value below -4.25% growth). Current price $172.11; price is 139.7% above the model value.

DCF Value

4/5

FCF/share = $9.590, stage 1 growth = 11.2% for 5 years, terminal growth = 3%, discount rate = 10%. Stage 1 PV = $49.54, PV of terminal value = $148.98, DCF value = $198.53. Current price $172.11; price is 13.3% below the model value.

Margin of Safety

3/5

Graham value $71.81 (price is 139.7% above the model value); DCF value $198.53 (price is 13.3% below the model value).

Price-to-Book

1/5

P/B of 6.58; the framework scores above 5.0 as 1.

Business quality

Moat Evidence

Not scored

A moat (a brand, a network, switching costs, patents, scale, a licence) is not a number in the filings, so Valerius doesn’t score it. Below are the figures and the words moat analysis starts from, from the company’s own 10-K filings. The conclusion is yours.

Return on capital, each year

Above 15% in 7 of 10 years (2016-2025); lowest 2.9%, highest 42.7%.

Gross margin, each year

Between 54.7% and 64.6% over 10 years (a range of 9.9 points).

Competition, in the company’s own words · 10-K filed Nov 5, 2025

The latest 10-K has no section headed “Competition” that could be quoted. Open the filing to read how the company describes its markets.

Return on capital = operating income / (total assets − current liabilities), the ROIC row’s definition; 15% is the framework’s return threshold. Gross margin = gross profit / revenue. Both from each year’s 10-K via SEC EDGAR. Moat analysis commonly looks at whether returns and margins held up over many years. These figures don’t say whether the company has an advantage, what it is, or whether it will last.

Capital Allocation

5/5

Capital allocation, 2022-2025: dividends or buybacks paid in every year (pass); $33.18B paid out against $40.66B of free cash flow (pass); total debt $15.48B to $14.81B, down 4.3%, 1.0x EBITDA (pass: not up more than 10%); shares outstanding 1.12B to 1.07B, down 4.2% (pass). 4 of 4 tests passed; the framework scores that as 5.

Filings

Company notices to the SEC

Not scored

Three kinds of event the company reported to the SEC in the last 5 years, from its filings on SEC EDGAR.

These are events the company reported to the SEC. An auditor change or a late filing can have many causes; each date links to the filing, where the company explains it. Valerius does not score these.

How the Graham and DCF values were calculated

  Graham Formula:
    IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y)
    EPS = $8.64, g = 0.0%, Y = 4.5
    g floored at 0.0% (3-year EPS CAGR was -11.7%; below -4.25% the formula returns a negative value)
    IV = $71.81
    Current price $172.11 vs Graham value $71.81 — price is 139.7% above the model value.

  DCF:
    FCF/share = $9.590
    Stage 1 growth = 11.2% for 5 years | terminal growth = 3.0% | discount rate = 10.0%
      Y1: $10.665 → PV $9.695
      Y2: $11.859 → PV $9.801
      Y3: $13.187 → PV $9.908
      Y4: $14.664 → PV $10.016
      Y5: $16.306 → PV $10.125
    Stage 1 PV sum = $49.54
    Terminal value at end of Y5 = $239.94
    PV of terminal value = $148.98
    DCF value = $198.53
    Current price $172.11 vs DCF value $198.53 — price is 13.3% below the model value.

Data from yfinance summary figures and financial statements, and from the company’s 10-K filings via SEC EDGAR; computed at a price of $172.11. Every score is calculated from the figures by the framework’s fixed rules, and the explanation beside it is generated from the same figures: Graham value, DCF value, margin of safety, ROIC, profit margins, debt-to-equity, price-to-book, EPS trend, ROE trend, free cash flow, retained earnings and capital allocation. No AI is involved in this scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence, without a score. Read each score with the figures beside it. Intrinsic value calculations are model outputs based on stated assumptions, not predictions.

Recent headlines · third-party publishers · not investment advice

In the news

Loading headlines...

The 8 newest headlines whose title names the company, shown automatically and never chosen by Valerius. From third-party publishers via Yahoo Finance, linked to the source. Valerius doesn't write or endorse them. Not investment advice.

QCOM · Qualcomm

QCOM price