Price · last 3 months · daily close
SBAC price
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
ValeriusBeta - Not investment advice
Research · S&P 500 · Real Estate
The numbers, the scorecard and what analysts say, with the source for each. Information, not advice.
Price · last 3 months · daily close
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
Value Scorecard · run 2026-10-19
The REIT version isn't used for this company: its 10-K filings have no Nareit FFO line. Its checks are the standard ones, which don't fully fit how a REIT works.
11 of the 12 checks that carry a score were scored from the data available. 1 could not be scored (ROE Trend) and was left out, so the score is out of 55 instead of 60. The label uses the same share of the available points as for a full scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence from the filings, without a score.
Earnings & returns
Diluted EPS: $4.22 (2022), $4.61 (2023), $6.94 (2024), $9.80 (2025). It rose every year; the framework scores that as 5.
Shareholder equity is negative in 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, so ROE has no meaningful value and is not scored.
ROIC of 15.1%: operating income of $1.34B divided by $8.90B of capital (total assets $11.58B minus current liabilities $2.68B), fiscal year to Dec 31, 2025, as filed in the 10-K (SEC EDGAR). The framework scores 15-20% as 4.
Net margin of 34.5%; the framework scores above 20% as 5; gross margin 74.2%, operating margin 52.2%.
Balance sheet & cash
Shareholder equity is negative, so debt-to-equity has no meaningful value (total debt $15.21B, total cash $327.05M). The framework scores negative equity as 1. Calculated from the balance sheet in yfinance (at Jun 30, 2026) because yfinance's summary figure was not available.
Free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditure): $1.07B (2022), $1.31B (2023), $1.11B (2024), $1.07B (2025). It ended at or below 2022; the framework scores that as 2.
Retained earnings, as filed in the 10-Ks (SEC EDGAR): -$7.48B (2022), -$7.45B (2023), -$7.33B (2024), -$7.25B (2025). The latest balance is negative (an accumulated deficit); the framework scores that as 1. REITs are required to pay out most of their taxable income, which commonly leaves this balance negative.
Valuation models
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y) = $9.27 x (8.5 + 2 x 20.0) x (4.4 / 4.5) = $439.60 (EPS CAGR 45.8% capped at 20%). Current price $183.09; price is 58.4% below the model value.
FCF/share = $7.089, stage 1 growth = 1.9% for 5 years, terminal growth = 3%, discount rate = 10%. Stage 1 PV = $28.34, PV of terminal value = $71.16, DCF value = $99.50. Current price $183.09; price is 84.0% above the model value.
Graham value $439.60 (price is 58.4% below the model value); DCF value $99.50 (price is 84.0% above the model value).
Book value is negative; the framework scores negative book value as 1.
Business quality
A moat (a brand, a network, switching costs, patents, scale, a licence) is not a number in the filings, so Valerius doesn’t score it. Below are the figures and the words moat analysis starts from, from the company’s own 10-K filings. The conclusion is yours.
Return on capital, each year
Above 15% in 1 of 10 years (2016-2025); lowest 6.0%, highest 15.1%.
Gross margin, each year
Between 74.2% and 1372.4% over 10 years (a range of 1298.2 points).
Competition, in the company’s own words · 10-K filed Feb 27, 2026
Domestic Site Leasing – In the U.S., our primary competitors for our site leasing activities are (1) large independent tower companies including American Tower Corporation and Crown Castle International; (2) a number of regional independent tower owners; (3) wireless service providers that own and operate their own towers and lease, or may in the future decide to lease, antenna space to other providers; (4) owners and operators of alternative facilities such as rooftops, outdoor and indoor distributed antenna system (“DAS”) networks, billboards, utility poles, and electric transmission towers; and (5) owners and operators of alternative wireless technology systems and architectures. International Site Leasing – Internationally, our competition consists of wireless service providers that own and operate their own tower networks, large multinational, national, and regional independent tower companies, and alternative facilities such as rooftop, outdoor and indoor networks, billboards, utility poles, and electric transmission towers. We believe that tower location and capacity, quality of service, density within a geographic market, and price historically have been, and will continue to be, the most significant competitive factors affecting the domestic and international site leasing business. Site Development – The site development business is competitive and price sensitive. We believe that the majority of our competitors in the U.S.
The opening of the company’s “Competition” section in its 10-K, quoted word for word, not summarized or edited. It is the company’s own description, not Valerius’s view, and may include the company’s expectations. Open the filing.
Return on capital = operating income / (total assets − current liabilities), the ROIC row’s definition; 15% is the framework’s return threshold. Gross margin = gross profit / revenue. Both from each year’s 10-K via SEC EDGAR. Moat analysis commonly looks at whether returns and margins held up over many years. These figures don’t say whether the company has an advantage, what it is, or whether it will last.
Capital allocation, 2022-2025: dividends or buybacks paid in every year (pass); $2.81B paid out against $4.55B of free cash flow (pass); total debt $15.17B to $15.32B, up 1.0%, 7.6x EBITDA (pass: not up more than 10%); shares outstanding 0.11B to 0.11B, down 2.2% (pass). 4 of 4 tests passed; the framework scores that as 5.
Filings
Three kinds of event the company reported to the SEC in the last 5 years, from its filings on SEC EDGAR.
Loading...
These are events the company reported to the SEC. An auditor change or a late filing can have many causes; each date links to the filing, where the company explains it. Valerius does not score these.
Graham Formula:
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y)
EPS = $9.27, g = 20.0%, Y = 4.5
g capped at 20.0% (3-year EPS CAGR was 45.8%)
IV = $439.60
Current price $183.09 vs Graham value $439.60 — price is 58.4% below the model value.
DCF:
FCF/share = $7.089
Stage 1 growth = 1.9% for 5 years | terminal growth = 3.0% | discount rate = 10.0%
Y1: $7.224 → PV $6.567
Y2: $7.361 → PV $6.083
Y3: $7.501 → PV $5.635
Y4: $7.643 → PV $5.220
Y5: $7.789 → PV $4.836
Stage 1 PV sum = $28.34
Terminal value at end of Y5 = $114.60
PV of terminal value = $71.16
DCF value = $99.50
Current price $183.09 vs DCF value $99.50 — price is 84.0% above the model value.Data from yfinance summary figures and financial statements, and from the company’s 10-K filings via SEC EDGAR; computed at a price of $183.09. Every score is calculated from the figures by the framework’s fixed rules, and the explanation beside it is generated from the same figures: Graham value, DCF value, margin of safety, ROIC, profit margins, debt-to-equity, price-to-book, EPS trend, ROE trend, free cash flow, retained earnings and capital allocation. No AI is involved in this scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence, without a score. Read each score with the figures beside it. A check that cannot be scored from the available data is shown as not scored and left out of the composite score. Intrinsic value calculations are model outputs based on stated assumptions, not predictions.
Recent headlines · third-party publishers · not investment advice
The 8 newest headlines whose title names the company, shown automatically and never chosen by Valerius. From third-party publishers via Yahoo Finance, linked to the source. Valerius doesn't write or endorse them. Not investment advice.