ValeriusBeta - Not investment advice

Research · S&P 500 · Communication Services

TTWO · Take-Two Interactive

The numbers, the scorecard and what analysts say, with the source for each. Information, not advice.

Price · last 3 months · daily close

TTWO price

Loading the price chart...

Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.

Value Scorecard · run 2026-10-18

13 value checks: 12 scored 1 to 5 where the data allows, plus moat evidence

17/55
low value score11 of 12 checks scored

11 of the 12 checks that carry a score were scored from the data available. 1 could not be scored (Margin of Safety) and was left out, so the score is out of 55 instead of 60. The label uses the same share of the available points as for a full scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence from the filings, without a score.

Earnings & returns

EPS Trend

1/5

Diluted EPS: -$7.03 (2023), -$22.01 (2024), -$25.58 (2025), -$1.62 (2026). The latest figure is at or below zero; the framework scores that as 1.

ROE Trend

1/5

ROE (net income / common equity): -12.4% (2023), -66.1% (2024), -209.5% (2025), -8.5% (2026). Median -39.2%, lowest -209.5%; the framework scores a median 5% or less as 1.

ROIC

1/5

ROIC of -1.5%: operating income of -$104.20M divided by $6.79B of capital (total assets $9.38B minus current liabilities $2.59B), fiscal year to Mar 31, 2026, as filed in the 10-K (SEC EDGAR). The framework scores below 5% as 1.

Profit Margins

1/5

Net margin of -4.8%; the framework scores a negative net margin as 1; gross margin 57.1%, operating margin 0.5%.

Balance sheet & cash

Debt-to-Equity

3/5

Debt-to-equity of 0.82; the framework scores 0.8-1.5 as 3 (total debt $2.94B, total cash $1.83B).

Free Cash Flow

4/5

Free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditure): -$203.10M (2023), -$157.80M (2024), -$214.60M (2025), $461.50M (2026). It rose every year but one and ended above 2023; the framework scores that as 4.

Retained Earnings

1/5

Retained earnings, as filed in the 10-Ks (SEC EDGAR): $1.16B (2023), -$2.58B (2024), -$7.06B (2025), -$7.36B (2026). The latest balance is negative (an accumulated deficit); the framework scores that as 1.

Valuation models

Graham IV

1/5

Trailing EPS is -$1.73; the Graham formula requires positive trailing EPS, so no intrinsic value is computed.

DCF Value

1/5

FCF/share = $6.718, stage 1 growth = 11.5% for 5 years, terminal growth = 3%, discount rate = 10%. Stage 1 PV = $34.99, PV of terminal value = $105.78, DCF value = $140.77. Current price $205.28; price is 45.8% above the model value.

Margin of Safety

Not scored

Needs both a Graham value and a DCF value. Graham value N/A (not comparable); DCF value $140.77 (price is 45.8% above the model value).

Price-to-Book

1/5

P/B of 10.64; the framework scores above 5.0 as 1.

Business quality

Moat Evidence

Not scored

A moat (a brand, a network, switching costs, patents, scale, a licence) is not a number in the filings, so Valerius doesn’t score it. Below are the figures and the words moat analysis starts from, from the company’s own 10-K filings. The conclusion is yours.

Return on capital, each year

Above 15% in 1 of 10 years (2017-2026); lowest -78.9%, highest 16.6%.

2017: 6.2%, 2018: 6.7%, 2019: 9.0%, 2020: 14.6%, 2021: 16.6%, 2022: 10.7%, 2023: -9.7%, 2024: -36.6%, 2025: -78.9%, 2026: -1.5%

Gross margin, each year

Between 41.9% and 57.2% over 10 years (a range of 15.3 points).

2017: 42.5%, 2018: 49.9%, 2019: 42.9%, 2020: 50.1%, 2021: 54.5%, 2022: 56.2%, 2023: 42.7%, 2024: 41.9%, 2025: 54.4%, 2026: 57.2%

Competition, in the company’s own words · 10-K filed May 22, 2026

Competition in the interactive entertainment industry is based on innovation, features, playability, product quality, brand name recognition, compatibility with popular platforms, access to distribution channels, price, marketing, and customer service. Our business is driven by hit titles, which require increasing budgets for development and marketing. Competition for our titles is influenced by the timing of

The opening of the company’s “Competition” section in its 10-K, quoted word for word, not summarized or edited. It is the company’s own description, not Valerius’s view, and may include the company’s expectations. Open the filing.

Return on capital = operating income / (total assets − current liabilities), the ROIC row’s definition; 15% is the framework’s return threshold. Gross margin = gross profit / revenue. Both from each year’s 10-K via SEC EDGAR. Moat analysis commonly looks at whether returns and margins held up over many years. These figures don’t say whether the company has an advantage, what it is, or whether it will last.

Capital Allocation

2/5

Capital allocation, 2023-2026: dividends or buybacks paid in 0 of 4 years (fail); $0 paid out against -$114.00M of free cash flow (fail: free cash flow was negative); total debt $3.49B to $2.96B, down 15.2%, 2.4x EBITDA (pass: not up more than 10%); shares outstanding 0.17B to 0.19B, up 9.8% (fail: up more than 2%). 1 of 4 tests passed; the framework scores that as 2.

Filings

Company notices to the SEC

Not scored

Three kinds of event the company reported to the SEC in the last 5 years, from its filings on SEC EDGAR.

Loading...

These are events the company reported to the SEC. An auditor change or a late filing can have many causes; each date links to the filing, where the company explains it. Valerius does not score these.

How the Graham and DCF values were calculated
  Graham Formula:
    Trailing EPS -$1.73 — formula requires positive trailing EPS, no value computed.

  DCF:
    FCF/share = $6.718
    Stage 1 growth = 11.5% for 5 years | terminal growth = 3.0% | discount rate = 10.0%
      Y1: $7.491 → PV $6.810
      Y2: $8.352 → PV $6.902
      Y3: $9.312 → PV $6.997
      Y4: $10.383 → PV $7.092
      Y5: $11.578 → PV $7.189
    Stage 1 PV sum = $34.99
    Terminal value at end of Y5 = $170.35
    PV of terminal value = $105.78
    DCF value = $140.77
    Current price $205.28 vs DCF value $140.77 — price is 45.8% above the model value.

Data from yfinance summary figures and financial statements, and from the company’s 10-K filings via SEC EDGAR; computed at a price of $205.28. Every score is calculated from the figures by the framework’s fixed rules, and the explanation beside it is generated from the same figures: Graham value, DCF value, margin of safety, ROIC, profit margins, debt-to-equity, price-to-book, EPS trend, ROE trend, free cash flow, retained earnings and capital allocation. No AI is involved in this scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence, without a score. Read each score with the figures beside it. A check that cannot be scored from the available data is shown as not scored and left out of the composite score. Intrinsic value calculations are model outputs based on stated assumptions, not predictions.

Recent headlines · third-party publishers · not investment advice

In the news

  • Loading headlines...

The 8 newest headlines whose title names the company, shown automatically and never chosen by Valerius. From third-party publishers via Yahoo Finance, linked to the source. Valerius doesn't write or endorse them. Not investment advice.