Price · last 3 months · daily close
XOM price
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
ValeriusBeta - Not investment advice
Research · S&P 500 · Energy
The numbers, the scorecard and what analysts say, with the source for each. Information, not advice.
Price · last 3 months · daily close
Loading the price chart...
Daily closing prices via yfinance. Quotes are delayed. Past prices are not a guarantee of future results.
Value Scorecard · run 2026-10-18
Earnings & returns
Diluted EPS: $13.26 (2022), $8.89 (2023), $7.84 (2024), $6.70 (2025). It ended at or below 2022; the framework scores that as 2.
ROE (net income / common equity): 28.6% (2022), 17.6% (2023), 12.8% (2024), 11.1% (2025). Median 15.2%, lowest 11.1%; the framework scores a median 15-20% as 4.
ROIC of 11.1%: earnings before interest and taxes of $41.87B (pre-tax income $41.27B plus interest expense $603.00M; the 10-K's financial data has no standard operating income figure) divided by $376.65B of capital (total assets $448.98B minus current liabilities $72.33B), fiscal year to Dec 31, 2025, as filed in the 10-K (SEC EDGAR). The framework scores 10-15% as 3.
Net margin of 9.1%; the framework scores 5-10% as 3; gross margin 29.8%, operating margin 15.9%.
Balance sheet & cash
Debt-to-equity of 0.16; the framework scores below 0.3 as 5 (total debt $42.37B, total cash $10.59B).
Free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditure): $58.39B (2022), $33.45B (2023), $30.72B (2024), $23.61B (2025). The latest figure is half the 2022 figure or less; the framework scores that as 1.
Retained earnings, as filed in the 10-Ks (SEC EDGAR): $432.86B (2022), $453.93B (2023), $470.90B (2024), $482.49B (2025). It rose every year; the framework scores that as 5.
Valuation models
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y) = $7.77 x (8.5 + 2 x 0.0) x (4.4 / 4.5) = $64.58 (EPS CAGR -13.2% floored at 0%; the formula returns a negative value below -4.25% growth). Current price $178.98; price is 177.2% above the model value.
FCF/share = $5.027, stage 1 growth = 0.0% (revenue CAGR -1.6% floored at 0%; the company is valued as if it does not grow rather than extrapolating the decline) for 5 years, terminal growth = 3%, discount rate = 10%. Stage 1 PV = $19.06, PV of terminal value = $45.93, DCF value = $64.99. Current price $178.98; price is 175.4% above the model value.
Graham value $64.58 (price is 177.2% above the model value); DCF value $64.99 (price is 175.4% above the model value).
P/B of 2.84; the framework scores 1.5-3.0 as 3.
Business quality
A moat (a brand, a network, switching costs, patents, scale, a licence) is not a number in the filings, so Valerius doesn’t score it. Below are the figures and the words moat analysis starts from, from the company’s own 10-K filings. The conclusion is yours.
Return on capital, each year
Above 15% in 2 of 10 years (2016-2025); lowest -10.0%, highest 26.2%.
Gross margin, each year
Not reported: the filings don’t state a gross profit or cost of revenue figure, as is common for oil and gas companies, banks and insurers.
Competition, in the company’s own words · 10-K filed Feb 18, 2026
As noted in Item 1 above, the energy and petrochemical industries are highly competitive. We face competition not only from other private firms, but also from state-owned companies that are increasingly competing for opportunities outside of their home countries and as partners with other private firms. In some cases, these state-owned companies may pursue opportunities in furtherance of strategic, national, or supranational objectives of their government owners, with less focus on financial returns than companies owned by private shareholders, such as ExxonMobil. Technology and expertise provided by industry service companies or AI may also enhance the competitiveness of firms that may not have the internal resources and capabilities of ExxonMobil or reduce the need for resource-owning countries to partner with private-sector oil and gas companies in order to monetize national resources. As described in more detail above, our hydrocarbon-based energy products are also subject to growing and, in many cases, government-supported competition from alternative energy sources. In addition, as we enter new markets in pursuit of lower-emission and other new business opportunities, we will need to compete effectively with established competitors in these markets, as well as with new market entrants seeking to capitalize on these opportunities, while successfully navigating changing market conditions or technologies. Reputation. Our reputation is an important corporate asset.
The opening of the company’s “Competition” section in its 10-K, quoted word for word, not summarized or edited. It is the company’s own description, not Valerius’s view, and may include the company’s expectations. Open the filing.
Return on capital = operating income / (total assets − current liabilities), the ROIC row’s definition; 15% is the framework’s return threshold. For a year whose 10-K financial data has no standard operating income figure, earnings before interest and taxes (pre-tax income plus interest expense) is used. Gross margin = gross profit / revenue. Both from each year’s 10-K via SEC EDGAR. Moat analysis commonly looks at whether returns and margins held up over many years. These figures don’t say whether the company has an advantage, what it is, or whether it will last.
Capital allocation, 2022-2025: dividends or buybacks paid in every year (pass); $136.62B paid out against $146.17B of free cash flow (pass); total debt $47.70B to $41.71B, down 12.6%, 0.6x EBITDA (pass: not up more than 10%); shares outstanding 4.08B to 4.18B, up 2.4% (fail: up more than 2%). 3 of 4 tests passed; the framework scores that as 4.
Filings
Three kinds of event the company reported to the SEC in the last 5 years, from its filings on SEC EDGAR.
Loading...
These are events the company reported to the SEC. An auditor change or a late filing can have many causes; each date links to the filing, where the company explains it. Valerius does not score these.
Graham Formula:
IV = EPS x (8.5 + 2g) x (4.4 / Y)
EPS = $7.77, g = 0.0%, Y = 4.5
g floored at 0.0% (3-year EPS CAGR was -13.2%; below -4.25% the formula returns a negative value)
IV = $64.58
Current price $178.98 vs Graham value $64.58 — price is 177.2% above the model value.
DCF:
FCF/share = $5.027
Stage 1 growth = 0.0% for 5 years | terminal growth = 3.0% | discount rate = 10.0%
Stage 1 g floored at 0.0% (3-year revenue CAGR was -1.6%; the company is valued as if it does not grow rather than extrapolating the decline)
Y1: $5.027 → PV $4.570
Y2: $5.027 → PV $4.155
Y3: $5.027 → PV $3.777
Y4: $5.027 → PV $3.434
Y5: $5.027 → PV $3.121
Stage 1 PV sum = $19.06
Terminal value at end of Y5 = $73.97
PV of terminal value = $45.93
DCF value = $64.99
Current price $178.98 vs DCF value $64.99 — price is 175.4% above the model value.Data from yfinance summary figures and financial statements, and from the company’s 10-K filings via SEC EDGAR; computed at a price of $178.98. Every score is calculated from the figures by the framework’s fixed rules, and the explanation beside it is generated from the same figures: Graham value, DCF value, margin of safety, ROIC, profit margins, debt-to-equity, price-to-book, EPS trend, ROE trend, free cash flow, retained earnings and capital allocation. No AI is involved in this scorecard. The moat is shown as evidence, without a score. Read each score with the figures beside it. Intrinsic value calculations are model outputs based on stated assumptions, not predictions.
Recent headlines · third-party publishers · not investment advice
The 8 newest headlines whose title names the company, shown automatically and never chosen by Valerius. From third-party publishers via Yahoo Finance, linked to the source. Valerius doesn't write or endorse them. Not investment advice.